View Full Version: ESRB ratings flawed?

Neo Community > Video games in General & Console Gaming > ESRB ratings flawed?



Title: ESRB ratings flawed?


GuardianVR - August 21, 2005 10:47 PM (GMT)
Well I've always questioned ESRB ratings and let's just say I don't always agree with them. I think there should be a rating in between T and M. So I developed a rating system of my own that I think would be more accurate with little changes, tell me if you like it or not and why. If you'd change it how would you do so.

LK - Lil kid's 3+
K - kids 7+
PT - preteens 10+
T - teens 13+
MT - mature teen 16+
AO - adults only 18+

Kuroro - August 21, 2005 11:02 PM (GMT)
that would be great!!!!!! except the teen part, i think it should be 14+, but that's just imo.

Shady - August 22, 2005 11:45 AM (GMT)
I don't read the esrb.
;)

jlej - August 22, 2005 07:12 PM (GMT)
i like your idea.

Darth_Ashwee - August 22, 2005 08:32 PM (GMT)
Not many places here sell AO games and I already buy mature rated games despite the fact that i am 15. My dad stoped looking at the content in games. Hell he bought me God if War and if he had seen there was nudity in it he would have never bought it for me. he bought vampire the masqurade bloodlines too.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree