I've no clue who started the unsolicited email regarding the "Impeachment of the Board of Directors", but I for one don't appreciate it.

FIRST - nice to slam Phil Calerdone the way that email did - he has done so much positive for this league and now has his mind preoccupied with his wife - shame on whoever started this - You're proving yourself to be a pure JACKASS!

Knowing what stress can do to a person first-hand - you all should be ashamed of yourselves. I thought all of you loved Dianna and yet you're acting like a bunch of idiots? Can't you see what you're doing to the league and the members of the league. Take your petty crap out of the league - knock each other around in a neutral place or in the middle of Euclid Avenue and be done with it already!

SECOND - Putting people's work email address is totally TABOO in my book. Again - just proving what a JACKASS this person is. Personally I KNOW FOR A FACT that many companies have email and Internet useage policies and absue of these policies can cause a person to be disciplined or even worse, lose their job. NICE GOING......

GROW THE HELL UP ALREADY. ARE YOU (AND I DON'T KNOW AND DON'T REALLY CARE WHO YOU REALLY ARE) TRYING TO SCREW THIS LEAGUE UP LIKE THE CDC?

I haven't been involved nor do I wish to become involved, I wasn't at the Lake Erie Classic - I don't know what happened and I don't want to know, I am going to Canada under unknown circumstances (and I don't care!!! - I'm going to get away and see friends) - but whoever used my email address to BASH OTHERS IN THIS LEAGUE - TAKE ME OFF YOUR CONTACTS LIST BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO PLAY THOSE GAMES! Especially since you find it necessary to hide behind an email address anyone could have made up.

Anyone who didn't receive the email I am speaking of - let me know and I'll be more than happy to forward it to you so you can see how immature our members are being.

Just expressing my opinion folks.....
The horse is already dead - quit beating it!

Kat

MY BAD :o :o

I guess because of the anger in my head and lack of sleep made me interpret the email a little incorrectly......JUST SLIGHTLY.
I see there is no "improper behavior allegations directed toward Phil", and I apologize to anyone for that statement. Unless you're considering the position assignment Chris currently holds, since the decisioin was made and assigned by Phil.

Oh, and who ever started this email......you have no skeletons?????

It is still very poor judgement to include business email addresses, especially in something as viscious as this.

Still - I think you should take up your differences with each other and be done with it. Act like the adult(s) we are supposed to be.

Kat

Well I guess I can count my blessings that someone lost my emaill addy...lol

Where I didn't get a copy I do kknow of its contents and I must say I totally agree with Kat on this issue. This is way out of line and petty.

Chris was appointed to 1st Vice as the bylaws currently call for. When a position is vacant it falls to the President to appoint a replacement. If this position is in the Board of Directors, the next cahir down the rung moves up and that position is then filled by appointment of the President. So since the 1st VP was vacant, Phil appointed Chirs to 1st VP and appointed Bob to 2nd VP as state per the bylaws.

As stated in a perivous post, give this current administration some time to get things done and grow up. Quit harassing the membership cause you didn't get your way and stop with the bashing...

This post seems a little "funny", phoney?

As in the past Kat posts and Yeager chimes in to back her.

How would anyone actually obtain people's work addresses associated with the League to be sent by e-mail in the first place? Think about it.

If true, it must be someone that has the the info at hand. Or someone that on a regular basis communicates with ones at their place of work. Or, this whole post is made up to get attention.

Sorry, I don't buy this whole thing.

First, Kat, Far as I have read here no one else has had real issues with any e-mails.

If you main concern was to alert about others about unsolicited email, why bring up the Classic on this post?

No one else is complaining, they got e-mails at work but, you.

Linda, you don't have to count your blessings your work address was not sent an e-mail, you don't have one.

And as always, you take Kat's side and she takes yours?
You state you don't have a copy of "said" e-mail but know of it's contents and totally agree with Kat. Duh, go figure.
Kat clearly stated she would be more than happy to forward such so you should have a copy.

Then, you go into details about the bylaws? Where were the bylaws brought up on this post???

Stop wasting space here.

Plenty of people had issue with the Email, they just all felt their feelings were very well summed up in Kat's post. Everyone jumping on here posting the same thing just to prove something to you would be the waste of space wouldn't it?

Have you noticed that not a single person has ever agreed with you on here? Has the feeling of being unwanted or unwelcome ever been stronger for you? Come to think of it if your personality in person is anything like it is on here I'm sure it has.

Tony,

None here have to prove anything to me.

Some in this small forum don't like my comments. I thought this is what a forum is all about. Exchanging thoughts and expressing one's views on a topic and getting feedback. Correct me if I am wrong.

The way corporate laws are now restricting personal e-mail at the workplace, I just don't understand why anyone would let their work e-mail be known in the first place.

Kat states: mentioning work email addresses.

SECOND - Putting people's work email address is totally TABOO in my book. Again - just proving what a JACKASS this person is. Personally I KNOW FOR A FACT that many companies have email and Internet useage policies and absue of these policies can cause a person to be disciplined or even worse, lose their job. NICE GOING......


Tony, you cloud the issue, (if there was one), with blah, blah about me.
Back to the topic. How could anyone send an email to mass members places of work, if such an e-mail exists at all, unless someone has access to members work e-mails?

And who would have access to such addresses?

Kat stated:

I guess because of the anger in my head and lack of sleep made me interpret the email a little incorrectly......JUST SLIGHTLY.
I see there is no "improper behavior allegations directed toward Phil", and I apologize to anyone for that statement. Unless you're considering the position assignment Chris currently holds, since the decisioin was made and assigned by Phil.


But, her first post was:

I've no clue who started the unsolicited email regarding the "Impeachment of the Board of Directors", but I for one don't appreciate it.

FIRST - nice to slam Phil Calerdone the way that email did - he has done so much positive for this league and now has his mind preoccupied with his wife - shame on whoever started this - You're proving yourself to be a pure JACKASS!

Does Kat have an infatuation for Phil? Is Kat someone close to Phil?

No one really know who actually posts under what names besides the web master for a site.

I know how forums work. The stater can see which posts come from each computer. User names can be changed for the general readers.

Tony, I thought in previous posts I was to be banned.

Just food for thought.

Once again you've proven how totally clueless you are. This forum could be a positive tool for those who care about darts. Your constant negative comments and inuendo's about topics that you have no clue about are not wanted. You keep trying to twist comments into some evil topic. If that's how you process information, I really feel sorry for you.

Go find some other group to harrass, because quite frankly, it's getting old.

This is strictly for you "For The League" -

I never said I received the email at MY work email address - I stated that within the body of the email individual’s work email addresses are listed for recipients to respond to. There is nothing incorrect or suspicious about my post - and Linda's response and your allegations of "phony" are full of about as much crap as you are.

I find no need to further explain myself, ESPECIALLY TO YOU. You've no clue about what you’re talking about, and as usual you are making a feeble attempt to start trouble. The ACTIVE members of OUR LEAGUE are aware of what was sent out. End of discussion.

This proves what a simple minded person you really are "For The Leauge" -

For The League States: "Does Kat have an infatuation for Phil? Is Kat someone close to Phil?"

To answer - no infatuation :o , but I do consider myself someone close to BOTH PHIL & DIANNA.

My best to Dianna, hope you're feeling better - and good luck everyone at league tonight.

Kat

You were, unfortunately, not banned in the past. You were simply asked to make your posts constructive and not just constantly negative. Apparently that plea to you has failed.

That said, I DO NOT understand what good you think you are doing "for the league", of which I don't even think you are a member, by trying to deny the existance of an email you know nothing about. Then again maybe you do, who knows. Coming out and "publicly" argueing the existance of something is a good way to make people think you or others you associate with were not involved in its creation. There could be no other motivation to argue something so pointless. That is not the issue here, just a thought that occured to me.

Simply because someone uses a work email address to correspond with others does NOT give someone the right to plaster it out in mass and attempt to cause them grief.

What were you trying to accomplish "for the league" when you accused Kat of making the whole thing up? How exactly is that being constructive?

Have you ever seen a post that even comes close to supporting you on here? Constant negativity breeds contempt. Fortunately all the contempt being felt and displayed right now is for you. You are accomplishing only one thing with your negative posts. Bringing those who may not agree together in a common cause, dislike and pity for you.

I will not justify another of your posts with a response, but again let me warn you. If you continue to do nothing constructive on here only try to cause trouble with your pettyness and twisting of the facts you WILL BE BANNED.

Why the big upset? This is a very small forum maybe 20 or less respond to.

Kat NOW says:

I never said I received the email at MY work email address - I stated that within the body of the email individual’s work email addresses are listed for recipients to respond.

No, Kat you did not state this in any of your original posts.

Your first post stated:

I've no clue who started the unsolicited email regarding the "Impeachment of the Board of Directors", but I for one don't appreciate it.

SECOND - Putting people's work email address is totally TABOO in my book. Again - just proving what a JACKASS this person is. Personally I KNOW FOR A FACT that many companies have email and Internet useage policies and absue of these policies can cause a person to be disciplined or even worse, lose their job. NICE GOING.....

Kat, why in your first post did you bring up work email addresses?

You were concerned with supporting Phil as President, as many did and still do. But, why did you bring up "Impeachment of the Board of Directors? Then go on to support only Phil only?

If this so called e-mail is a true issue, many more would have had something to say about it.

Sorry, I still don't buy this load of crap being posted here to a selective few.

I think the whole idea is to save face with the new President and all the issues at hand that are not being correctly being attended to in many ways.

Tony if you feel the need, ban me from posting.

Of course you would like everyone to agree.
Sorry, forums are just that. Open to others views.

Oh my God Can For The League Just Shut Up and Go Get A Life. You have way to much time on your hand to KEEP re-writing everything just so that you can feel important.

You are a sorry excuse for a human being and I am for one glad that I can say you ARE NOT and WILL NOT ever be called a friend. You must be a very lonely person to have to sit here and post your stupid thoughts which noone agrees with.

I will say it here and Now "I FOR ONE WOULD LOVE TO SEE FOR THE LEAGUE BANNED FROM OFF OF HERE."
All she wants is to cause trouble and act like she is the know it all of everything.

Noone wants to talk to you except yourself so bugger off

Vickie

You all dodge the problem with original poster and I am the bad guy?

Please, if a real issue did exist many more would have responded.

VA, since you had nothing to add other than to slam me. You are the one with no life. Or are you an aka that posts here under different names? Hard to tell.
Bugger off? This is new. Didn't know the club had aussies or wales in it's membership.

for your information i dont have to use alias to post anything that is my first initial of my first name and the my true lastn name and anyone can tell you that For The League......

now who's hiding behind names I believe that would be you since you post under for the league.

But whatever I was only saying what i felt and that is I for one was tired of you always starting trouble. So slam or no slam Im over you just like everyone else is.


As far as bugger off that was the nicer way to say what i really wanted to say.

Whatever, have a nice life and if posting on here makes you feel important then whatever your still nothing in everyone else's thoughts

Signed
Vickie

Just for the record, the email that is being referred to in the above post was received by some members and some non-members. The person that called me
about it first, has not been a member for 4 or 5 years. Other people that called me about were members and were upset about getting the email at work. Some of these emails I do not even have here at the office.

Some of the people gave us names of people that would have their work emails.
Most of them only gave their work emails to certain people. So we can narrow down the person or persons, because of the different people that have said they received it, it could be two people working together. It is only the same names that I keep hearing that had work email address's to the people that got it.

Whoever it is - they are cowards and not man enough to stand up and say I did it.
But-- they have told someone that they sent it and it will just be a matter of time until who ever sent it, makes the person(s) they told mad and it will all come out.