View Full Version: Larry Brooks article 10/25

NY IslandersCountry > General Islanders News > Larry Brooks article 10/25


Title: Larry Brooks article 10/25
Description: Islanders' season must be about hockey


MMingE - October 25, 2009 07:40 PM (GMT)
Normally Larry Brooks gets a lot of crap on this board but he makes a great point this time:

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/islanders/i...Nyd48O0EEb1eDRK

QUOTE
Islanders' season must be about hockey, not future projects
By LARRY BROOKS

Last Updated: 2:22 PM, October 25, 2009

Posted: 2:12 AM, October 25, 2009

MONTREAL -- This just in: GM Garth Snow says the Islanders will keep the identity of the first overall selection in the 2010 Entry Draft a secret until it's time to announce the pick from their table.

The season can't be about the Lighthouse Project. It can't be about local election results. It can't be about the owner and whether or not Charles Wang, who has every right to be impatient with the process, is going to seek to sell the club if he does not receive approval to begin construction on his project.

It can't be.

This season has to be about progress. This season has to be about putting a product on the ice that's worth the price of admission.

This season can't be about head coach Scott Gordon all but declaring that his team will be in its typical trade-deadline, veteran-dump mode, as he did a couple of weeks ago in explaining that moving captain Doug Weight to left wing would "make him more attractive to our team and 29 other teams down the road."

John Tavares is as advertised. He's a scoring machine. The manchild could use some help -- no doubt a strong veteran presence on the wing capable of setting him up would come in handy -- but the Tavares-Kyle Okposo budding relationship should be an enjoyable one to monitor as it progresses.

Dwayne Roloson and Martin Biron, however, have been anything but as advertised, with Roloson specifically the club's biggest disappointment. It appeared Snow had corrected the goaltending deficiency that undermined last year's team by signing the two veteran free agents to stabilize the position until Rick DiPietro's projected, but hardly anticipated, return. Yet somehow the pair has been less reliable than last season's Yann Danis-Joey McDonald tandem.

It's understandable that Wang would be reluctant to throw bad money in after good without approval for his Lighthouse Project, but the fact is that in most cases you get what you pay for, and the Islanders reached the salary cap floor of $40.8 million only by including potential Entry Level and over-35 bonuses of approximately $4.75 million to reach the NHL's minimum threshold.

A younger team will have a lower payroll, that's understood. A team that can't attract premium free agents because of inferior facilities will have a lower payroll as well, and that's the Islanders.

Understand, Lighthouse may determine whether Wang wants to keep the Islanders on Long Island (or in neighboring precincts such as Brooklyn or Queens), but unless Gary Bettman has perjured himself repeatedly in the Coyotes' court case in Phoenix, the NHL is committed to keeping clubs in their home markets if buyers can be found for them. It is impossible to believe that prospective purchasers would not step up to keep the Islanders in New York as long as a new arena is in the equation.

But this season isn't about that. It can't be about that. It has to be about an improving product on the ice. It has to be about making a save or two in nets. It has to be about developing an identity. It has to be about giving the fans a reason to spend their good money to watch a bad team play hockey.

Westfall18 - October 25, 2009 07:53 PM (GMT)
For once Larry speaks the truth..for once i dont have the urge to smack him in the junk with a steel toed jack boot...

Shooter - October 25, 2009 08:17 PM (GMT)
Larry has only said what most people (who are suckered into the Wang hype) know. It's all about the Lighthouse. It's never been about the Islanders. If you think it was, Wang's got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn (no pun intended for the moving conscious here).

4CUPZ - October 25, 2009 09:04 PM (GMT)
THE ONLY THING CAME TO MIND AFTER READING THAT

NO sh!t SHERLOCK

Shooter - October 25, 2009 09:05 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (4CUPZ @ Oct 25 2009, 04:04 PM)
THE ONLY THING CAME TO MIND AFTER READING THAT

NO sh!t SHERLOCK

:lol:

7th Woman - October 26, 2009 12:50 AM (GMT)
As much as all of you would like to think that Charles Wang is all about the Lighthouse and doesn't give a rats a$$ about hockey, I can only say the following.

I spoke to Garth Snow this morning about this article.

I can't tell you what he said verbatum as we were off the record, but I will tell you this....

Charles Wang does NOT (can I repeat that?) NOT make the hockey decisions for the team. He has given Garth Snow the authority and the room to do as he sees fit.

You may not like what he is currently doing, and that is your right. However... you don't have his job.

aries44475 - October 26, 2009 04:30 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 25 2009, 08:50 PM)
As much as all of you would like to think that Charles Wang is all about the Lighthouse and doesn't give a rats a$$ about hockey, I can only say the following.

I spoke to Garth Snow this morning about this article.

I can't tell you what he said verbatum as we were off the record, but I will tell you this....

Charles Wang does NOT (can I repeat that?) NOT make the hockey decisions for the team. He has given Garth Snow the authority and the room to do as he sees fit.

You may not like what he is currently doing, and that is your right. However... you don't have his job.

So Wang hasn't set a limit for payroll? Snow has the authority to spend up to 53 million this year and lock players into 3-6yr deals if he wants? I'd like to hear those answers "on the record" because until I here that I'm not cutting Wang any slack.....is it all Wang's fault?? No, but either Snow has a budget on money and years or he's just awful at selling this team to FA's.

OlTimeHockey - October 26, 2009 05:00 AM (GMT)
So Charles Wang is not involved in hockey decisions other than hiring someone at $11.25 an hour to do so for him? Great. Next Islanders GM will be picked up outside a Long Island Home Depot.

bumpkin - October 26, 2009 06:30 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 25 2009, 07:50 PM)
As much as all of you would like to think that Charles Wang is all about the Lighthouse and doesn't give a rats a$$ about hockey, I can only say the following.

I spoke to Garth Snow this morning about this article.

I can't tell you what he said verbatum as we were off the record, but I will tell you this....

Charles Wang does NOT (can I repeat that?) NOT make the hockey decisions for the team. He has given Garth Snow the authority and the room to do as he sees fit.

You may not like what he is currently doing, and that is your right. However... you don't have his job.

Then we are in worse shape than we think. Assuming Garth could add some salary, he should do something about the D. Thanks for listening.
This is not how one builds(rebuilds) a winning tradition.

7th Woman - October 26, 2009 11:11 AM (GMT)
Let's just see what happens in March.
By then Rick will be back in net (or not)
And the Islanders' will have a good idea of where they are in the standings.

You may not like the decisions he has made, but he is sticking to a direction and he has the respect of the other GMs in this league.

He even managed to piss off Brian Burke by not giving into him... and that's a bonus unto itself.

Sorry, one more thing. Over the weekend I saw an interview with Bon Jovi. He said something interesting. He was talking about Richie Sambora's drug addiction and how he stepped in and got him into rehab.

"You make a decision and you live with it. I made the decision. That's what I do." Jon told the reporter in no uncertain terms. It sounded eerily familiar to me.

Because that's what the person in charge does. He makes the hard decisions and lives and dies with the outcome. That's probably the first and last time Garth Snow will be referenced in the same paragraph with Jon BonJovi.

BSutter21 - October 26, 2009 11:22 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 26 2009, 06:11 AM)
Sorry, one more thing. Over the weekend I saw an interview with Bon Jovi. He said something interesting. He was talking about Richie Sambora's drug addiction and how he stepped in and got him into rehab.

"You make a decision and you live with it. I made the decision. That's what I do." Jon told the reporter in no uncertain terms. It sounded eerily familiar to me.

Because that's what the person in charge does. He makes the hard decisions and lives and dies with the outcome. That's probably the first and last time Garth Snow will be referenced in the same paragraph with Jon BonJovi.

though one could argue garth was "living on a prayer" when he put this roster together

OlTimeHockey - October 26, 2009 02:51 PM (GMT)
All the disgusting Bon Jovi rumors coming back to me head....(none were true, but "poser" metal always got the angst or hardcore metal heads.....let's stop before TMC comes by!)

stevedepot - October 26, 2009 03:10 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 25 2009, 08:50 PM)
As much as all of you would like to think that Charles Wang is all about the Lighthouse and doesn't give a rats a$$ about hockey, I can only say the following.

I spoke to Garth Snow this morning about this article.

I can't tell you what he said verbatum as we were off the record, but I will tell you this....

Charles Wang does NOT (can I repeat that?) NOT make the hockey decisions for the team. He has given Garth Snow the authority and the room to do as he sees fit.

You may not like what he is currently doing, and that is your right. However... you don't have his job.

I really do admire your loyalty to the organization.

I keep thinking back to Mike Milbury.
Nobody worked harder and cared so much as Mad Mike.
In the end, he was inept.


I know you watch the practices and ask questions etc etc.
But you're following THIS team. There are 29 others doing the same.

Some with more talent,
some with less,
some with better coaching
yet only one is a giant mess....US.

(yes I'll keep my day job, that was horrible)

I've been barking about Scott Gordon's bullwinkle "system" since last year.
I've been barking about Wang's meddling in the past along with his focus on the gold at the end of a the rainbow with the LH nonsense.

here's something for you to think about:
If you're a successful businessman, you DO NOT buy a FARM and hire people
to grow sh!t who have little to NO horticultural background. You cannot prosper
if everyone is "learning on the job".

:dontknow:

IslandersWin86 - October 26, 2009 03:16 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (stevedepot @ Oct 26 2009, 11:10 AM)
yet only one is a giant mess....US.


Phoenix: 6k attendance, ownership coup's, dejected coach.

They're certainly in a bigger mess than we are.

stevedepot - October 26, 2009 03:19 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (IslandersWin86 @ Oct 26 2009, 11:16 AM)
QUOTE (stevedepot @ Oct 26 2009, 11:10 AM)
yet only one is a giant mess....US.


Phoenix: 6k attendance, ownership coup's, dejected coach.

They're certainly in a bigger mess than we are.

Only the Leafs are worse off.


The Coyotes are 6-3. Thats situation wil work out. They have a GM (cough) Maloney who's doing it right by taking care of prospects and NOT rushing them now for marketing reasons.


Shooter - October 26, 2009 03:59 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (stevedepot @ Oct 26 2009, 10:19 AM)
QUOTE (IslandersWin86 @ Oct 26 2009, 11:16 AM)
QUOTE (stevedepot @ Oct 26 2009, 11:10 AM)
yet only one is a giant mess....US.


Phoenix: 6k attendance, ownership coup's, dejected coach.

They're certainly in a bigger mess than we are.

Only the Leafs are worse off.


The Coyotes are 6-3. Thats situation wil work out. They have a GM (cough) Maloney who's doing it right by taking care of prospects and NOT rushing them now for marketing reasons.

I don't think it's for marketing reasons Steve with the Islanders. It's to keep the payroll down. I don't believe for one second that Wang hasn't given Snow a budget and it is where it is right now.

I do admire Snow if he's been given a budget and this is all he has to work with. If Wang has said, go for it, then he's a major disappointment. No one can be this inept in a. protecting the young kids with no enforcer. b. gave us a goalie who can't play at the age of 40. c. didn't get some NHL veteran out there that would have loved to played with Tavares. d. come up with a better defense corp than we have.

OlTimeHockey - October 26, 2009 04:16 PM (GMT)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Snow regularly alluded to Wang giving him the leeway to add salary? About every time the question popped up?

I believe he has. So that makes it the latter.

Snow has Thompson articles talking about his "tough guy" training in the offseason, gotten Rolo and Biron and a coach who has left defense out of his plans, got Rob Schremp to compliment Tambellini and Berganheim as the Enigma Line but no one to play with Tavares (he DID believe we had all the tools to make the playoffs Nolan's second year training deadline, so he probably believes in this roster just as much) and he probably was giddy over Gervaise and FMIV's development and thought Streit and Co. were solid.

I think that pretty much sums up Garth based on Garth's prior actions.

stevedepot - October 26, 2009 04:18 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Shooter @ Oct 26 2009, 11:59 AM)
QUOTE (stevedepot @ Oct 26 2009, 10:19 AM)
QUOTE (IslandersWin86 @ Oct 26 2009, 11:16 AM)
QUOTE (stevedepot @ Oct 26 2009, 11:10 AM)
yet only one is a giant mess....US.


Phoenix: 6k attendance, ownership coup's, dejected coach.

They're certainly in a bigger mess than we are.

Only the Leafs are worse off.


The Coyotes are 6-3. Thats situation wil work out. They have a GM (cough) Maloney who's doing it right by taking care of prospects and NOT rushing them now for marketing reasons.

I don't think it's for marketing reasons Steve with the Islanders. It's to keep the payroll down. I don't believe for one second that Wang hasn't given Snow a budget and it is where it is right now.

I do admire Snow if he's been given a budget and this is all he has to work with. If Wang has said, go for it, then he's a major disappointment. No one can be this inept in a. protecting the young kids with no enforcer. b. gave us a goalie who can't play at the age of 40. c. didn't get some NHL veteran out there that would have loved to played with Tavares. d. come up with a better defense corp than we have.

Oh no, we actually agree more than you think there.

My "marketing" issues center around rushing Bailey last year when he clearly wasn't ready.
Instead they marketed the kid like he was more than he was.

The reason I pointed out the situation with Maloney is that he was hesitant to send 18, 19 year old high draft picks back down to JR's or even the minors for more maturing, physical development prior to this year where he gets it. The short term patience with youngsters can
go a long way towards long term success with their development vs rushing them.
Not everyone is Tavares.

I know Snow's hands are probably tied by budget restrictions.

MNIslander13 - October 26, 2009 10:58 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 26 2009, 05:11 AM)
He even managed to piss off Brian Burke by not giving into him... and that's a bonus unto itself.


7th, respect and all, but I read that and think, "Big F'n Deal".

I don't care which GM respects Garth or who hates him. I just want him to get the best damn team on the ice. Win more then "just enough games" to just squeak into the play-offs. Make some play-off runs (not 1 and out). And just maybe get a :cup: out of the deal.


I'm by no means "hooked" into all the behind the scenes of the this team. By as I watch/look at it from a far, I'm not seeing the improvements. I see history repeating itself again. How long before J.T. hits the Ziggy status and he gets "Milbury-ed" and the rebuild continues.


We all want "it" back, but I can't see it happening in the next 5 years. :cry:

7th Woman - October 27, 2009 01:17 AM (GMT)
If you seriously think this is the only team out of 30 that "is a mess," then you're not paying attention either.

LEDZEP - October 27, 2009 01:29 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 26 2009, 09:17 PM)
If you seriously think this is the only team out of 30 that "is a mess," then you're not paying attention either.

Isles are a mess........... :dontknow:

MNIslander13 - October 27, 2009 10:46 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (LEDZEP @ Oct 26 2009, 07:29 PM)
QUOTE (7th Woman @ Oct 26 2009, 09:17 PM)
If you seriously think this is the only team out of 30 that "is a mess," then you're not paying attention either.

Isles are a mess........... :dontknow:

:yea: :puke:

rifleman22 - October 27, 2009 07:26 PM (GMT)
Screw Larry Brooks. He is still a Messier jock sniffin' know nothing homer Rag fan that happens to write a column in the Post.

Leave the Islanders alone, Larry, and continue to write the absolute BS you write about those Rag gays. Slow news day? We don't care.

stevedepot - October 27, 2009 07:32 PM (GMT)
Well the Leafs won their first game of the year yesterday and unlike us, it was in regulation.

Our record is 1-4-5 and our only win coming via shootout.

Reality. Reality, reality. Forget the "the glass half full".

LEDZEP said it best in his humorous way in the other thread...
the glass is broken.

Teams that go places don't look for silver linings, they dig till they find gold.
We don't even have a shovel and Brook' article was very accurate.

4CUPZ - October 27, 2009 08:23 PM (GMT)
user posted image

WE ALREADY STRUCK ISLANDER GOLD

PYRITE :rolleyes:

MNIslander13 - October 28, 2009 11:47 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (4CUPZ @ Oct 27 2009, 02:23 PM)
user posted image

WE ALREADY STRUCK ISLANDER GOLD

PYRITE :rolleyes:

:argh:




Hosted for free by InvisionFree